MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Protocol for Conditional Knockout Mouse Model of OHT and Glaucoma

2025· book-chapter· en· W4413229176 on OpenAlexaff
Judith A. West‐Mays, Fatima Shirazee

Bibliographic record

VenueBENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlaucomaConditional gene knockoutRetinalTrabecular meshworkKnockout mouseIntraocular pressureOphthalmologyMutantMelanopsinCorneaGene knockoutOcular hypertensionBiologyMedicineGeneticsGenePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter describes the protocols used to create a conditional knockout mouse model to study partially closed-angle glaucoma where the intraocular pressure (IOP) is raised beyond normal levels. The Cre/loxP approach was employed as a strategy to conditionally inactivate the AP-2β gene from the developing periocular mesenchyme (POM) that is responsible for creating the trabecular meshwork (TM) (Taiyab et al., 2022). The Mgp-Cre knock-in (Mgp-Cre.KI) mice, in combination with the AP-2β floxed mice, were utilized to create a targeted deletion of AP-2β to the TM area. The AP-2β TMR KO mutants exhibit an absent TM and underdeveloped Schlemm’s canal (SC) and partial adherence of the iris to the cornea. The mutants have significantly higher IOP than their wild-type littermates by one month of age, and this is correlated with a progressive, significant loss of retinal ganglion cells, reduced retinal thickness, and reduced retinal function, as measured by electroretinography. Thus, these mutant mice can serve as a model for understanding and treating progressive human primary angle-closure glaucoma with associated ocular hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooksSame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207