MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Pseudomorphic changes after iron sulfide concretions in Jurassic limestones, Ionian Basin, Greece: tracking changes in basinal fluids

2025· article· en· W4413237254 on OpenAlexafffund
Nikolaos Dimopoulos, Georgia Pe‐Piper, David J. W. Piper, Nicolina Bourli, Elena Zoumpouli, George Iliopoulos, Avraam Zelilidis

Bibliographic record

VenueMarine and Petroleum Geology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographySaint Mary's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinPaleontologyConcretionGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Middle Jurassic limestones, deposited on deep-water highs in the Ionian Basin, include Fe-rich concretions. Mineralogical and textural studies by SEM show the concretions now consist of goethite with minor lepidocrocite, hematite and quartz. The cm-scale concretions include radiating spheres and pseudomorphs after ammonites, with cubic and pyritohedral pseudomorphs after pyrite. Smaller mm-scale concretions occur at limestone hardgrounds. Concretions have REE signatures and high Mo and V suggesting formation in hypoxic water overlying a local euxinic basin. Textures suggest the following sequence of events: (1) Sea floor diagenetic iron monosulphide and pyrite concretions and veins. (2) With burial, recrystallisation to cubes or pyritohedrons of pyrite. (3) Pseudomorphous alteration of pyrite to hematite, with the 5 % volume reduction resulting in sub-micron pores that filled with silica (now quartz). (4) Widespread alteration of hematite to goethite with texturally complex, coupled dissolution-reprecipitation reactions. (5) Widespread secondary porosity, with precipitation of fibrous goethite and minor lepidocrocite. (6) Late cross-cutting fractures have Mn-rich minerals, with exotic trace elements such as asbolane (Co, Ni) and romanechite (Ba). The original pyrite concretions persisted during burial diagenesis until Paleogene uplift of the basin margins allowed ingress of oxidising meteoric water, circulated by thermal anomalies related to salt domes. Pyrite was oxidized to hematite and micropores were filled by silica. Oligocene thrusting created a new fracture set, increased loading of basinal sediments and allowed ingress of abundant meteoric water creating supergene alteration. Both chert and Fe-rich concretions provide important insights into diagenetic and hydrothermal evolution of thick limestone successions. [249 words] • Fe-rich concretions and veins are common in Middle Jurassic pelagic limestones. • SEM shows Fe-rich concretions pseudomorph burial diagenesis pyrite crystal forms. • Concretions altered to hematite with silica in μm-sized pores, then to goethite. • Hematite due to ingress of meteoric water when basin margin uplifted in Paleocene. • Later goethite formed by coupled dissolution-precipitation after basin inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMarine and Petroleum GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207