The Significance of Weak Interfaces for the Kinematics and Rheology of the Ductile Deformation of Earth Materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rheology of Earth's lithosphere under natural deformation conditions is of paramount importance for all tectonic processes and for addressing why plate tectonics emerged on Earth. Most continuum theories, extrapolations of experimental results to natural conditions, and numerical models assume that rheologically distinct elements comprising earth materials are perfectly bonded to each other. This assumption is inadequate in many situations and may lead to an unrealistically high estimate of the actual strength of earth materials. A micromechanical theory for weak interfaces is developed here for the viscous deformation of heterogeneous materials. The weak‐interface theory is validated against existing theoretical results and natural data and then applied to assess the rheology of two‐phase materials. Numerical calculations based on the weak‐interface theory confirm that weak interfaces between rigid porphyroclasts and the matrix were responsible for the porphyroclasts' shape‐preferred orientations observed in many crustal shear zones. Slippery interfaces can weaken the material so significantly that its bulk strength may fall below the Reuss average—long held to be the lower bound strength of a heterogeneous material. In a two‐phase mixture, the ultimate lower bound is when the second phase is made of rigid voids. The weak‐interface theory incorporates the effect of rheological discontinuities into homogenization methods to obtain the bulk rheology of Earth materials and offers a method for constructing anisotropic flow laws for plastic creep of polycrystalline materials undergoing intracrystalline dislocation creep and grain boundary sliding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".