Genetic variation in zoophagy and dietary shift in the phytozoophagous tarnished plant bug, <i>Lygus lineolaris</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Phytozoophagous insects, whose diets mainly consist of plant resources, can also feed on animal resources. Within populations, individuals' diets may vary according to their food preferences. The environment and their genetics determine these preferences. The degree of prey voracity (zoophagy) is likely to influence the ecological interactions of individuals. In the case of crop pests, these ecological interactions determine their economic impact. This study aimed to measure the genetic variation in the degree of zoophagy of a phytozoophagous pest, the tarnished plant bug Lygus lineolaris (Palisot de Beauvois) (Hemiptera: Miridae). Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs were offered, as animal resources, to L. lineolaris individuals from 15 isofemale lines in a laboratory experiment, where individuals from each line did or did not have access to an alternative plant resource. The results indicate that tarnished plant bugs consume a significant quantity of E. kuehniella eggs per day and that this behaviour varies according to the availability of a plant resource. Additionally, the broad‐sense heritability ( H 2 ) in zoophagy is significant, with an estimated 0.27. Moreover, highly zoophagous lines are less responsive to the availability of plant resources than lowly zoophagous lines. The results suggest that individuals within tarnished plant bug populations exhibit varying levels of prey consumption, which may indicate potential differences in trophic behaviour. However, the relationship between fitness and prey consumption in this phytozoophagous insect has yet to be established.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".