MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413245221 · doi:10.17975/sfj-2025-009

Aging Powerfully: AI Blueprint for Chronic Disease Management and Social Determinants of Longevity: 2025 National Inter-University Health Data and AI Inquiry Program | Indicium 2025 Conference Proceedings

2025· article· en· W4413245221 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueSTEM Fellowship Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMentorshipBlueprintCourseworkMedical educationComputer sciencePsychologyData scienceMedicineEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Inter-University Health Data and AI Inquiry Program is a unique, interdisciplinary educational initiative that bridges the gap between traditional academic coursework and real-world data science research. Designed to foster agile learning and critical thinking, the program provides both undergraduate and graduate students with an exceptional opportunity to engage with Open Data and apply advanced data science techniques to meaningful, socially relevant health research challenges. Through this program, students develop and refine skills in uncovering hidden patterns and trends in both structured and unstructured datasets. They gain hands-on experience using a wide range of analytical tools and programming languages—such as Python, R, and diverse machine learning frameworks—to conduct in-depth data analysis. Indicium is an annual research mentorship program and competition designed to introduce undergraduate students to the process of independent scientific inquiry. Tailored for students with limited research experience, Indicium connects participants with mentors from diverse STEM backgrounds—including faculty members, graduate students, and medical professionals—who guide them through every stage of the research process. Throughout the program, students receive mentorship on research design, data analysis, and scientific communication, while also benefiting from skill-building workshops and networking opportunities with the broader scientific community. The theme for 2025, “Aging Powerfully: AI Blueprint for Chronic Disease Management and Social Determinants of Longevity,” challenged participants to explore how data and AI can advance our understanding of longevity and chronic disease management. Their investigations covered a wide array of topics—from designing AI-powered wearables for arthritis care, to leveraging sensor data for monitoring physical activity, to modelling gut-brain axis biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease using machine learning. We are continually inspired by the intellectual curiosity, creativity, and analytical skills demonstrated by this next generation of researchers. Their work not only contributes to the scientific discourse around longevity and chronic disease management but also exemplifies the spirit of innovation that these programs seek to foster. To showcase and celebrate their achievements, two national conferences were held in July 2025: the Eastern Canada Conference at the University of Toronto (July 10, 2025) and the Western Canada Conference at the University of Calgary (July 18, 2025). On behalf of STEM Fellowship, we extend our heartfelt congratulations to all participants. We also thank our dedicated team of STEM Fellowship volunteers whose tireless support made these programs possible. We would also like to gratefully acknowledge the invaluable partnership and contributions of Research Canada, Canadian Science Publishing, CPHIN, Underline, and Overleaf. Finally, we are deeply grateful to the University of Calgary Institutes for Transdisciplinary Scholarship for their generous support in enabling the publication of these conference proceedings. In partnership with Canadian Personalized Healthcare Innovation Network, Research Canada, Roche, Canadian Science Publishing, Underline.io, Overleaf. This publication was made possible by the generous support of the University of Calgary Institutes for Transdisciplinary Scholarship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTEM Fellowship JournalSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207