MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413257537 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0263

Young-GRAPPA 2024: Progress, Achievements, and Strategic Developments

2025· article· en· W4413257537 on OpenAlexaffvenue
André Lucas Ribeiro, Gizem Ayan, Hanna Johnsson, Roxana Coras, Michelle L M Mulder, Daniela B. Tovar-Bastidas, Dimitri Luz Felipe da Silva, Arani Vivekanantham, Fabian Proft

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and ImmunityWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Young Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (Y-GRAPPA) was established in 2021. As of July 2024, the group consists of 152 members, featuring a balanced gender distribution and a 70/30 split between rheumatology and dermatology specialties. In the last year, Y-GRAPPA updated its major project-the GRAPPA slide library-to include translations in 5 new languages, continued to publish the "Do Not Miss" newsletters, and presented "Virtual Highlights" for major international conferences (American Academy of Dermatology [AAD] annual meeting, European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology [EULAR] annual congress, European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology [EADV] congress, and American College of Rheumatology [ACR] Convergence). Presently, Y-GRAPPA is boosting social media presence and refining its organizational structure and activities. This includes restructuring committees with new leaders to each focus on specific objectives, streamlined leadership, and proactive member recruitment and engagement. The key objective of Y-GRAPPA remains to ensure active participation in all GRAPPA activities through collaboration and communication between Y-GRAPPA and senior GRAPPA members.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207