MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413258346 · doi:10.1109/tbme.2025.3599516

Point-of-Care Breast Imaging for Monitoring Neoadjuvant Treatment: Case Studies With Transmission-Based Microwave Imaging

2025· article· en· W4413258346 on OpenAlexafffund
Pedram Mojabi, Roger Y. Tsang, Bobbie-Jo Docktor, Danielle Deutscher, Anita Garland, Zahra Lasemiimeni, Jeremie Bourqui, Elise Fear

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Cancer Foundation
KeywordsMicrowave imagingBreast imagingMammographyMedical imagingMicrowaveMedical physicsTransmission (telecommunications)Magnetic resonance imagingUltrasonic imagingRemote patient monitoringMedicineBiomedical engineeringBreast cancerRadiologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsUltrasoundInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to track changes in tissues due to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a transmission-based microwave imaging system that scans the entire breast and is fast, comfortable and suited to point-of-care implementation. METHODS: Microwave scans are collected with patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Specifically, both breasts are scanned prior to each cycle of chemotherapy. The microwave scanner consists of planar transmit and receive arrays that are placed in contact with the breast. Signals with frequency content from 0.1 to 8 GHz are transmitted through the tissue, and the travel time of these signals is used to estimate the microwave frequency properties (permittivity). Property estimates at each sensor pair are mapped to the imaging plane. RESULTS: Case studies are presented for 6 patients. Comparison of the scans of left and right breasts suggests increased properties related to the presence of the tumor at the initial scan. Consistent properties are observed for the contralateral breast at different time points, while changes in the breast with the tumor are noted. In addition, differences between the breasts are more clearly depicted in dense breasts. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the potential for a transmission-based microwave scanner to provide feedback on treatment progress. SIGNIFICANCE: Point-of-care microwave imaging has the potential to offer regular, quantitative feedback on treatment progress as an alternative to palpation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207