MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413258542 · doi:10.2196/64183

Toward an Understanding of the Lack of Transmission of Facts About Human Papillomavirus: Qualitative Case Study

2025· article· en· W4413258542 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hind Bitar, Sarah Alismail

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Cancer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Abdulaziz University
KeywordsSnowball samplingCuriosityQualitative researchSocial mediaPsychological interventionCervical cancerPsychologyMedicineTransmission (telecommunications)Interpersonal communicationSocial psychologyNursingCancerComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary cause of cervical cancer, a largely preventable disease. Although extensive information about HPV is available and could help women prevent infection, a widespread lack of knowledge transmission hinders many women in Saudi Arabia from taking necessary preventive steps. Previous studies have reported low levels of HPV awareness among women in Saudi Arabia, highlighting the importance of understanding the barriers to effective information dissemination. Identifying the factors that influence the transmission of HPV-related knowledge is essential for designing targeted and impactful public health interventions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the factors that either block or facilitate the transmission of HPV-related facts among women in Saudi Arabia, using the HPV facts transmission model as a theoretical framework. METHODS: A qualitative case study design was used, involving semistructured interviews with 20 women in Saudi Arabia aged 23 to 42 years. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling. The data were analyzed using pattern matching to assess how participant responses aligned with 11 predefined propositions from the HPV facts transmission model, which integrates individual and social influences on health information-seeking behavior. RESULTS: Of the 11 propositions, 8 (73%) were supported by the data. Five were individual-level factors (personal need to learn, stigma, language barriers, technology use, and individual qualities), while 3 were social-level factors (social promotion, social support, and cultural norms). These factors were classified as barriers, resources, or both, depending on their influence on women's intention to seek HPV-related knowledge. For instance, personal motivation, curiosity, and digital access facilitated knowledge acquisition, while stigma, limited Arabic-language resources, and conservative social norms served as major deterrents. Three propositions (social structure, suppression structure, and interaction or collaboration) did not align with participant experiences and were excluded from the final model. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding these barriers and resources is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve HPV knowledge dissemination. Strategies should include culturally appropriate awareness campaigns, accessible Arabic-language educational materials, and the integration of digital tools to encourage confidential learning. Addressing stigma through community engagement and structured education programs can further enhance HPV fact transmission, ultimately supporting informed decision-making and preventive health behaviors among women in Saudi Arabia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.379
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR CancerSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207