Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p dir="ltr">Hydromancy is the act of searching for water with a dowsing rod.</p><p dir="ltr">This dance film is the abstract expression searching and finding the "oceanic feeling", a term from Carl Jung to describe those moments when we experience an intense connectedness with the universe (e.g. artistic inspiration).</p><p dir="ltr">The film was shot on Super-8 and 16 mm, and entirely optically printed (re-filmed frame by frame) to create all the movements and special effects. This film was runner-up for the best experimental film award at the 1998 International Film Festival of Rhode Island (Providence, USA). It also won the Chair's award at the Mel Hoppenheim School of Cinema.</p><ul><li>Runner up Best Experimental / Animation Award: Hydromancy.</li><li>RHODE ISLAND INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL (Providence, U.S.A).</li><li>Festival of New Dance (St. Johns, New Foundland)</li><li>Festival International du Nouveau Cinéma (Montreal)</li><li>Festival International de Figuera da Foz (Portugal)</li><li>Les Rendez-Vous du Cinéma Québecois (Montreal, Quebec) </li><li>Rhode Island International Film Festival (Providence - USA)</li><li>Dance on Camera: American Dance Films Association: ANTHOLOGY FILM ARCHIVES (New York, U.S.A.) (1999)</li></ul><p></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".