Big Data Pilot Zones and Supply Chain Resilience—Quasi‐Experimental Evidence From China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The establishment of big data pilot zones (BDPZs) has generated substantial scholarly and practical focus, yet there remains limited understanding of their effects on supply chain resilience (SCR) at the microenterprise level. This study utilizes China's BDPZ as a quasi‐experimental framework and analyzes firm‐level panel data from the second quarter of 2009 to the fourth quarter of 2023 to evaluate the effects of BDPZ on supply chain resilience (SCR) as well as the underlying mechanisms involved. BDPZ's effects are analyzed using a staggered difference‐in‐differences approach, and SCR at the firm level is assessed using the entropy weight method. The findings indicate that China's BDPZ significantly enhance firms' SCR. In addition, mechanism testing reveals that this enhancement is primarily achieved through improved product competitiveness, alleviated financing constraints, and accelerated digital transformation. Furthermore, a heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that the impact of BDPZ on SCR varies according to factors such as firms' growth stages, industry competitiveness, and transportation convenience. Finally, theoretical and practical implications are provided based on the findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it