Turbulence of Tropical Cyclones: From Peristrophic to Zonostrophic
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cyclostrophic rotation in the core region of tropical cyclones (TCs) imprints a distinct signature upon their turbulence structure. Its intensity is characterized by the radius of maximum wind, , and the azimuthal wind velocity at that radius, . The corresponding cyclostrophic Coriolis parameter, /, far exceeds its planetary counterpart, , for all storms; its impact increases with storm intensity. The vortex can be thought of as a system undergoing a superposition of planetary and cyclostrophic rotations represented by the effective Coriolis parameter, . On the vortex periphery, merges with . In the classical Rankine vortex model, the inner region undergoes solid‐body rotation rendering constant. In a more realistic representation, is not constant, and the ensuing cyclostrophic ‐effect sustains vortex Rossby waves. Horizontal turbulence in such a system can be quantified by a two‐dimensional anisotropic spectrum. An alternative description is provided by one‐dimensional, longitudinal, and transverse spectra computed along the radial direction. For rotating turbulence with vortex Rossby waves, the spectra divulge a coexistence of three ranges: Kolmogorov, peristrophic (spectral amplitudes are proportional to ), and zonostrophic (transverse spectrum amplitude is proportional to ). A comprehensive database of TC winds collected by reconnaissance airplanes reveals that with increasing storm intensity, their cyclostrophic turbulence evolves from purely peristrophic to mixed peristrophic‐zonostrophic to predominantly zonostrophic. The latter is akin to the flow regime harboring zonal jets on fast rotating giant planets. The eyewall of TCs is an equivalent of an eastward zonal jet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".