MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413272341 · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2025.100894

Characteristics of Myopic Traction Maculopathy in the Aier-SERI High Myopia Adult Cohort Study

2025· article· en· W4413272341 on OpenAlexaff
Kai Xiong Cheong, Yanfeng Jiang, Hla Myint Htoon, Wei Pan, Li-Lian Foo, Ziqi Hu, Ling Chen, Ecosse L. Lamoureux, Quan V. Hoang, Seang‐Mei Saw, Weizhong Lan

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal and Macular Surgery
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersSingapore Eye Research Institute
KeywordsMaculopathyTraction (geology)CohortMedicineOptometryOphthalmologyCohort studyGeologyRetinopathyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To describe the prevalence, clinical characteristics, associations, and visual outcomes of myopic traction maculopathy (MTM), which was defined by the presence of retinoschisis (RS), macular holes (MHs), or foveal retinal detachment (RD), in an adult high myope cohort in Changsha, China.Design: A cross-sectional study.Participants: Chinese adults with high myopia (defined as spherical equivalent [SE] less than or equal to -5 diopters [D]) in the Aier-Singapore Eye Research Institute High Myopia Adult Cohort Study, which is a prospective population-based study.Methods: Swept-source OCT was performed to detect RS, MH, and foveal RD.Multivariable generalized estimating equation analyses were performed to assess associations of MTM and the impact of MTM on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).Main Outcome Measures: Prevalence, clinical characteristics, associations, and visual outcomes of MTM.Results: Of 437 participants (839 eyes), MTM was observed in 20 participants with a prevalence of 4.6% (by participants) or in 24 eyes (with a prevalence of 2.9%; by eyes).Overall, the whole cohort (64.7% female) had a mean age of 42.9 ± 7.2 years, an SE of -9.5 ± 4.4 D, and an axial length (AL) of 27.3 ± 1.9 mm.Retinoschisis was the most common lesion (91.7%; 22/24 eyes with MTM).In the multivariable analysis, the prevalence of MTM was associated with a more myopic SE (odds ratio [OR]: 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.18;P = 0.03), longer AL (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65;P = 0.03), myopic macular degeneration (MMD) (OR: 12.77; 95% CI: 3.18-51.24;P < 0.001), and older age (OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11;P = 0.01).In the multivariable analysis, the prevalence of MTM was also associated with poorer BCVA (beta coefficient: -0.07; 95% CI: -0.13 to -0.01; P < 0.01).Conclusions: The prevalence of MTM was 4.6% in an adult high myope cohort.Associations with MTM include more myopic SE, longer AL, MMD, and older age.Myopic traction maculopathy is associated with poorer vision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOphthalmology ScienceSame topicRetinal and Macular SurgeryFrench-language works237,207