Management of pregnancy in a patient with previous surgical repair of classic bladder exstrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION & IMPORTANCE: Bladder exstrophy epispadias complex (BEEC) is a rare congenital midline malformation defect which requires complex, staged reconstruction of the bony pelvis and the genitourinary tract. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 26-year-old G3SA2 with previously reconstructed bladder exstrophy presented at 16 weeks +5 days gestation with severe bilateral hydronephrosis and inability to self-catheterize her Mitrofanoff diversion. She had bilateral nephrostomy tubes placed for the duration of pregnancy. Her pregnancy course was further complicated by recurrent pyelonephritis and progressive pelvic organ prolapse, culminating in cervical prolapse and concerns for uterine incarceration at 31 weeks. Given the complexity of her presentation, she was transferred from her rural community to a tertiary center and remained an inpatient throughout her third trimester. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Multidisciplinary planning involving obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, urology, and pediatrics led to the decision for an elective preterm caesarean section to minimize maternal morbidity. A healthy female infant was delivered without intraoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Bladder exstrophy is a rare condition; however, advances in reconstructive surgery have enabled female patients to achieve longer life expectancies and consider pregnancy during their reproductive years. Such pregnancies are associated with specific antenatal and intraoperative challenges, necessitating a multidisciplinary team approach to ensure safe and timely delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".