Misogyny and the BBC: Alisoun’s treatment in Chaucer’s <i>The Miller’s Tale</i> and the BBC’s modern adaptation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article compares Chaucer’s treatment of Alisoun in The Miller’s Tale with the British Broadcasting Corporation’s (BBC’s) treatment of Alison in its modern adaptation, which is shown to be more misogynist than the medieval tale. Chaucer’s Alisoun holds sexual power over the men in the tale, and she is more cunning than they are, avoiding any punishment or ridicule at the end of the tale. At the end of the BBC’s version, Alison is left helplessly standing at the side of the road waiting for Nick. Meanwhile, Nick is on a bus to Canterbury and has already found another couple to swindle. The viewers are left to wonder what will happen to Alison, since she has already left her husband, John, and was expecting to run away with Nick. The BBC’s version makes Alison seem foolish for falling for Nick and lets Nick come out on top, rather than Alison. Alison is treated like an object to be used and exchanged among men. The BBC’s ending and treatment of Alison highlights our society’s misogynies and views that women who “misbehave” should be punished in some way. The fact that many of Chaucer’s female characters (including Alisoun) have some sovereignty, and the fact that the BBC’s modern adaptation took away any power or agency that Alison could have had at the end of the story, sheds light on how far we have yet to go in dealing with problems related to misogyny in our society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".