MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413278696 · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11830-4

Unveiling molecular mechanisms and candidate genes for goss’s bacterial wilt and leaf blight resistance in corn through RNA-Seq analysis

2025· article· en· W4413278696 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mohammad Sayari, Sara V. Good, Dimitri Trubetskoy, Mohamed El-Shetehy, Aria Dolatabadian, Atta Soliman, Arash Kheirodin, Fouad Daayf

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Genomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WinnipegUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaManitoba Crop Alliance
KeywordsBiologyInoculationGeneMicrobiologyRNA-SeqRNAPathogenGene expressionGeneticsTranscriptomeHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Goss’s bacterial wilt and leaf blight (GWLB) induced by Clavibacter nebraskensis poses a significant threat to corn production in Canada and the US. We conducted RNA-Seq analyses on two corn hybrid lines with contrasting levels of susceptibility to GWLB, 447 (susceptible) and 450 (resistant), to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying corn resistance to the disease. The two selected corn lines were subjected to inoculation with two isolates of C. nebraskensis exhibiting distinct levels of aggressiveness: DOAB232 (DOAB), a weakly aggressive isolate and Cn14-5-1 (BACT), a highly aggressive one, or were left untreated (CTL) Total RNA was isolated from leaf tissue in three biological replicates for each hybrid x treatment combination five days post-inoculation (dpi), a timepoint selected to capture the early transcriptional response to pathogen infection. RNA-sequencing was performed following poly-A tail isolation of the RNA on all 18 samples (6 combinations * 3 replicates). Following data cleaning and filtering of the raw RNA-seq data, unsupervised clustering, differential expression and pathway analysis was conducted. Our analysis revealed extensive transcriptional reprogramming in both resistant and susceptible lines, particularly in the susceptible corn line (447) when inoculated with the either the weak or aggressive strain of C. nebraskensis, but also in the resistant corn line when inoculated with the aggressive bacterial isolate. Inoculation of the resistant corn line (450) to the aggressive C. nebraskensis isolate, led to increased expression of photosynthesis-related and defense-associated genes, and downregulation of secondary metabolism and stress responses pathways, while inoculation of the susceptible corn line (447) with the weakly aggressive C. nebraskensis isolate led to upregulation of defense-associated genes. The functions of some of the top differentially expressed genes in each comparison are discussed within the context of understanding the molecular underpinnings of corn resistance to GWLB disease to identify targets for genetic enhancement towards higher disease resistance levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.556
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC GenomicsSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207