The Sleeping Giant of Kalimantan: A Review of Fish and Fisheries of the Peatlands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extensive peatlands of Kalimantan, recognized for the critical ecosystem services they provide, are subject to broadscale degradation through land use change, deforestation, drainage and fire. An often-overlooked component of these peatlands are the fish and fisheries, which are central to local livelihoods. Here, a comprehensive review details the state of knowledge within the English and Indonesian literature on the importance, vulnerabilities and trajectories of fish communities and fisheries across Kalimantan. There is evidence that the fish communities are diverse, exhibit high levels of endemism and vary considerably among watersheds and seasons, but characterization of fish assemblages is incomplete. Peatland degradation is impacting fish communities, however, there are considerable gaps in understanding how changes are playing out, both among locations and in relation to different pressures. Fisheries play an important role in many, particularly Dayak, communities, providing a key source of protein, income, and cultural identity. Of particular concern are the impacts of increased fishing pressure and peatland drainage on fish stocks and fisheries yields. Restoration efforts may help reverse these declines, however, for restoration to be successful, initiatives must account for local perspectives and the importance of fisheries livelihoods. Finally, eight research priorities are presented, relating to fish ecology and fisheries livelihoods, essential for developing a comprehensive understanding of the peatland fish and fisheries of Kalimantan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".