MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413284794 · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyaf052.251

363. DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PSILOCYBIN AND LISURIDE ON SEROTONIN AND DOPAMINE NEURONAL ACTIVITY AND BEHAVIOR

2025· article· en· W4413284794 on OpenAlexaff
B. D. Richardson, Marco Pileggi, Thomas Prudhomme, Derek Wan-Yan-Chan, Ilia Shareghi-Ghahreman, Sofia Nasini, Valeria Bruno, Tor A. Strand, Marco Leyton, Nahum Sonenberg, Danilo De Gregorio, Jeffrey Sprouse, Francis Rodriguez Bambico, Gabriella Gobbi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychedelics and Drug Studies
Canadian institutionsStornoway Diamond (Canada)Memorial University of NewfoundlandMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLisuridePsilocybinDopamineSerotoninNeurosciencePsychologyPharmacologyMedicineHallucinogenDopamine agonistInternal medicineDopaminergicReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Psychedelics hold potential as therapeutics in psychological disorders. Even if they primarily act on 5-HT2A receptors, their mechanisms and effects on the brain are not well understood. Simply activating 5-HT2A receptors does not induce psychedelic effects. For example, psilocybin and lisuride both bind to 5-HT2A receptors, but only psilocybin induces hallucinogenic effects. Moreover, psilocybin and lisuride may both be effective in treating psychological disorders such as major depressive disorder. Aims & Objectives The goal of this study was to better characterize the differences and similarities between the effects of psilocybin and lisuride on serotonin (5-HT) neurons of the dorsal raphe nucleus, dopamine (DA) neurons of the substantia nigra (SN), and behavioral paradigms of locomotion and depressive-like behavior. Method Adult male C57BL6/N mice received intraperitoneal injections (i.p.) of psilocybin (0.5-3mg/kg) or lisuride (0.1-0.5mg/kg) or vehicle and 5-HT/DA neuron firing activity was recorded until the maximum inhibition was found. Moreover, other mice received i.p. injections of psilocybin (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg) or lisuride (0.05, 0.15, or 0.5 mg/kg) and tested in behavioral tests. Briefly, head twitch response was recorded in the first 10 minutes after injection, and then either open field test or forced swim test was conducted 20 minutes after injection. Results Psilocybin and lisuride inhibited 5-HT activity in the DRN (p = 0.0052, p = 0.0326, respectively). Moreover, the 5-HT2A antagonists MDL 100907 prevented the 5-HT inhibition induced by psilocybin, but not by lisuride. Both psilocybin and lisuride decreased the DA firing rate in SN neurons (p = 0.0198, p = 0.0418, respectively). MDL 100907 blocked the effect of lisuride and to a lesser extent of psilocybin. Only lisuride elicited an antidepressant-like effect at the highest doses tested (p = 0.007). Psilocybin, but not lisuride, elicited HTR, and lisuride blocked the psilocybin-induced HTR (p < 0.0001). Both psilocybin and lisuride decreased locomotion in the OFT (p < 0.0001, p = 0.0097, respectively). Discussion & Conclusions These results suggest that lisuride has antidepressant and sedative effects without producing HTR, likely due to its differential action on 5-HT and DA neurons. Lisuride inhibits the serotoninergic system, like psilocybin. However, the actions in which these two drugs use are different, with only psilocybin’s effect at the 5-HT2A receptor. Moreover, both lisuride and psilocybin inhibit the dopaminergic system. Although, our data suggest that while both drugs impact the dopaminergic system via 5-HT2A receptors, this is most prominent for lisuride, as psilocybin was only partially mediated by MDL 100907.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of NeuropsychopharmacologySame topicPsychedelics and Drug StudiesFrench-language works237,207