<i>RPE65</i> knockout <i>Xenopus laevis</i> have a compromised but detectable electroretinogram and altered visual responses, without retinal degeneration or altered melanophore dispersion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The isomerohydrolase RPE65 is a critical element of the visual cycle, the series of enzymatic reactions by which the chromophore of the visual pigments is regenerated following light exposure. In humans, mutations in the rpe65 gene cause a severe form of blindness called Leber’s congenital amaurosis. Studies of RPE65 -/- mice have shown dramatic depletion of 11- cis-retinal in the retina, resulting in a slow retinal degeneration. However, a number of studies suggest that RPE65 may not be necessary for the regeneration of photopigment in all photoreceptor types. Using CRISPR/Cas9 technology, we previously generated RPE65 knockout Xenopus laevis in order to test the involvement of rhodopsin chromophore in the cell death mechanisms associated with rhodopsin mutations and rhodopsin quality control. Here we further characterize the effects of RPE65 knockout in these animals, and show their rod photoreceptors have shortened outer segments that lack detectable rhodopsin photopigment. However, there is no progressive degeneration of rods or cones. Via electroretinography we found greatly reduced but significant responses to light under scotopic and photopic conditions. We also found reduced behavioral sensitivity to light, while light-induced melanophore dispersion was unaffected. RPE65 knockout X. laevis may be a useful system for examining RPE65-independent photosensation mechanisms in vertebrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".