MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4413287062 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7002324/v1

Habitat-specific trends in taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic diversity in European plant communities during the last 100 years

2025· preprint· en· W4413287062 on OpenAlexaff
Stephan Kambach, Ute Jandt, Alicia Teresa Rosario Acosta, José Manuel Álvarez‐Martínez, Manuele Bazzichetto, Erwin Bergmeier, Markus Bernhardt‐Römermann, Marta Carboni, Marcos Carlucc, María Laura Carranza, Alessandro Chiarucci, Milan Chytrý, Gabriella Damasceno, Jan Divíšek, Stefan Dullinger, Franz Essl, Emmanuel Garbolino, Michael Glaser, Ana González‐Robles, Behlül Güler, G. Hahn, Tracy Hruska, Florian Jansen, Anke Jentsch, Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro, W. Daniel Kissling, Klára Klinkovská, Ilona Knollová, Gianalberto Losapio, Udayangani Liu, Jonathan Lenoir, Frederic Lens, Bernd Lenzner, Antonio J. Perea, Laura Méndez, Julie Messier, Akira Mori, Francesca Napoleone, Roger Norum, Alexander Novakovskiy, Renske E. Onstein, Robin J. Pakeman, Josep Peñuelas, Remigiusz Pielech, Bruno X. Pinho, Peter Poschlod, Valerijus Rašomavičius, Christiane Roscher, Francesco María Sabatini, Brody Sandel, David Schellenberger Costa, Wolfgang Schmidt, Serge Sheremetiev, Tanvir Ahmed Shovon, Marko J. Spasojevic, Nathan G. Swenson, Grzegorz Swacha, Rubén Tarifa, Lubomír Tichý, Marcello Tomaselli, Alicia Valdés, Vigdis Vandvik, Martin Večeřa, Thomas Wohlgemuth, Helge Bruelheide

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftAustrian Science FundEuropean CommissionBiodiversa+
KeywordsHabitatDiversity (politics)Phylogenetic diversityGeographyFunctional diversityPhylogenetic treeEcologyPlant diversityBiologyBiodiversityPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies→French-language works237,207→