Effects of 10 Weeks Classical Chinese Dance Training on Flexibility, Balance and Muscle Strength of the Elderly
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of Classical Chinese Dance as a sports intervention for enhancing the physical capabilities of older adults. Methods Twenty-four participants were divided into experimental group ( N = 12, age 69.0 ± 1.5 years, body mass index [BMI] 22.2 ± 0.6 kg/m 2 ) and control group ( N = 12, age 69.1 ± 1.8 years, BMI 23.5 ± 0.8 kg/m 2 ). The Classical Chinese Dance intervention lasted for 10 weeks, with 90 min per class twice a week. Two-way analysis of variance was used to assess the effect of the training intervention on flexibility, balance, and muscle strength in the experimental and control groups. Results The experimental group (EG) significantly outperformed the control group (CG) in the Biceps Curl Test at both time points (EG Pre-test: 26.8 ± 4.8(t), Post-test: 30.5 ± 5.0(t); CG Pre-test: 20.8 ± 4.3(t), Post-test: 22.8 ± 6.4(t), p <.01) and in the Chair Sit-and-Reach Test at post-test ( p =.017). EG showed significant within-group improvements in upper-body strength, cardiorespiratory endurance, and agility, while CG declined in static balance (Pre-test: 0.9 ± 0.6, Post-test: 2.4 ± 2.5, p =.008) and agility (Pre-test: 4.9 ± 1.2, Post-test: 4.4 ± 1.3, p <.001). No significant changes were observed in Chair Stand or Grip Strength across the groups or times. Conclusion Classical Chinese Dance significantly enhances functional fitness in older adults, and barre training provides unique benefits for upper limb strength. Its adaptable intensity underscores its potential as an effective and accessible intervention for older adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it