MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413290168 · doi:10.1108/jkm-01-2025-0061

Functional and dysfunctional personality dispositions as antecedents of practical wisdom

2025· article· en· W4413290168 on OpenAlexaff
Alexander Serenko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Knowledge Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCultural Differences and Values
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDysfunctional familyPsychologyPersonalityKnowledge managementSocial psychologyComputer sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose This study aims to analyze functional and dysfunctional personality dispositions as antecedents of practical wisdom. Design/methodology/approach A survey was administered to 204 full-time employees recruited from the CloudResearch Connect crowdsourcing platform, and the data were analyzed by means of correlation analysis, linear regression, and fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA). Findings Practical wisdom is not an esoteric notion, and it may be measured by means of conventional research techniques, including surveys. Practical wisdom is not correlated with age, organizational tenure, or overall work experience. Functional personality dispositions of getting along with and getting ahead of people cultivate practical wisdom, and dysfunctional personality dispositions of moving away from people suppress it. While these personality dispositions are important, wisdom development is a complex process driven by a combination of multiple factors rather than by a single determinant. FsQCA may be successfully used to obtain a more comprehensive picture of the phenomenon of interest. Practical implications Practitioners should remain open-minded and not automatically discard or renounce the very concept of practical wisdom. Managers should administer the practical wisdom survey used in this study to identify clusters of practical wisdom in their organizations. Organizations should also distribute the Hogan Personality Content Single-Items inventory to all prospective employees during the hiring process and pay attention to all functional personality dispositions, as well as the dysfunctional personality dispositions of moving away from people, because these promote and suppress the development of practical wisdom, respectively. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to empirically explore personality dispositions as antecedents of practical wisdom in the knowledge management domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Knowledge ManagementSame topicCultural Differences and ValuesFrench-language works237,207