MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413290941 · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-62753-3

Genetic isolation and metabolic complexity of an Antarctic subglacial microbiome

2025· article· en· W4413290941 on OpenAlexaff
Kyung Mo Kim, Kyuin Hwang, Hanbyul Lee, Ahnna Cho, Christina Davis, Brent C. Christner, John C. Priscu, Ok-Sun Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPolar Research and Ecology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersKorea Polar Research InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMicrobiomeIsolation (microbiology)Computational biologyBiologyEvolutionary biologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microbes inhabiting and evolving in aquatic ecosystems beneath polar ice sheets subsist under energy-limited conditions while in relative isolation from surface gene pools and their common ancestral populations of origin. Samples obtained from beneath West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) allowed us to examine evolutionary relationships of and identify metabolic pathways in microbial genomes recovered from the Mercer Subglacial Lake (SLM) ecosystem. We obtained 1,374 single-cell amplified genomes (SAGs) from individual bacterial and archaeal cells that were isolated from samples of SLM's water column and sediments. These genomes reveal that a diversity of microorganisms including Patescibacteria exists in SLM. Comparative analyses show that most genomes correspond to new species and taxonomic groups, with phylogenomic and functional evidence supporting their genetic isolation from marine and surface biomes. Genomic data reveal diverse metabolisms in SLM that are capable of oxidizing organic and inorganic compounds via aerobic or anaerobic respiration. Distinct metabolic guild structures are observed for the subglacial populations, where trophic shifts from organotrophy to chemolithotrophy may depend on oxygen availability. Our SAG data suggest versatile metabolic capabilities in the characterized microbial assemblage, reveal key energy-generating strategies in the subglacial aquatic ecosystem, and provide a framework to assess microbial evolution beneath WAIS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicPolar Research and EcologyFrench-language works237,207