MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413295153 · doi:10.1177/23779608251367257

Registered Nurses’ Characteristics and Their Levels of Compassion Competence and Satisfaction: A Cross-Sectional Survey

2025· article· en· W4413295153 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jacqueline Galica, Stephanie Saunders, Chiamaka Madu, Ziwei Pan, Hok Kan Ling, Jennifer Waite, Denise Neumann-Fuhr, Erna Snelgrove‐Clarke

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Nursing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreOttawa HospitalQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCross-sectional studyCompetence (human resources)CompassionPsychologyMedicineSocial psychologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Although registered nurses are expected to treat patients with care and compassion, a variety of characteristics may influence their ability to express compassion. Objectives (1) To assess registered nurses’ level of compassion competence and compassion satisfaction, and; (2) to explore how individual-level, employment-related, and organization-level characteristics are associated with their level of compassion competence and compassion satisfaction. Methods Registered nurses working in any practice setting in Ontario, Canada, completed a cross-sectional electronic survey of valid and reliable measures. Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analyses were used to address study objectives. Results One hundred eighty-one registered nurses participated. Most identified as female ( n = 157; 96.3%), Caucasian ( n = 144; 88.3%), and completed baccalaureate training as their highest level of education ( n = 80; 50.6%). Participants’ average compassion competence score was higher than average (4.18 on a 5-point scale), and most participants ( n = 171, 98.3%) reported moderate to high levels of compassion satisfaction. Compassion satisfaction was the only significant predictor of compassion competence, which indicated a positive relationship ( β = 0.344, p < .001). Compassion competence was among a variety of significantly positive predictors of compassion satisfaction ( β = 0.652, p < .001). The other positive significant predictors of compassion satisfaction were higher than baccalaureate education ( β = 0.363, p < .001), full-time work status ( β = 0.253, p = .012), working in organizations with greater compassion practices ( β = 0.114, p = .005), and organizations with higher climate for change ( β = 0.292, p < .001). Conclusions Study findings illuminate varying degrees of significance for individual-level, employment-related, and organization-level characteristics and how these predict registered nurses’ levels of compassion. These distinctions have important implications for intervention development and future research in understanding compassionate care among nurses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.234
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open NursingSame topicMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsFrench-language works237,207