DNA methylation of food sensitization in a French-Canadian population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Food allergy (FA) is a great public health concern with an increased prevalence in the last decades. The underlying development mechanisms of FA and food sensitization (FS), which represents the first stage of development of FA, are influenced by environmental, epigenetic, and genetic factors. DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mediator of gene–environment interactions and key to understanding these mechanisms. Studies have linked whole-genome DNA methylation profile to FA and FS, but they all use methylation arrays. Methylation sequencing captures target regions of methylome with an extensive coverage. Thus, our objective was to identify CpG sites in genome-wide immune regulatory regions associated with FS and test their association with genetic variants using methylation quantitative trait loci (mQTL) analysis in French-Canadian individuals. In 114 individuals from the Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean asthma family cohort, a total of 10 CpG sites out of 5,233,004 CpG sites were associated with the FS status (P < 1 × 10–8). CpG sites were located in 10 genes (ARRDC1, B9D1, CFL1, CROCC, DHX36, DND1, PMS1, RASSF1, TOP2A, and USP21) all of which were associated with immune response and allergic diseases (allergy, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis) in the literature. Almost all individuals with FS clustered based on the methylation levels of these CpG sites which reinforces their importance and relevance to discriminate individuals with and without FS in our cohort. Among the top 10 most significant CpG sites, five were associated with 478 genetic variants in trans-mQTL (FDR < 1 × 10–8). To our knowledge, this is a unique association study between FS and DNA methylation using targeted bisulfite sequencing across the genome. This approach provides high-resolution assessment of genome-wide functional methylome that yields valuable understandings to this field of research. The results reveal potential relationships between FS, CpG sites, and genetic variants located in genes involved in allergic diseases. This provides potential insights on the underlying effects of DNA methylation and genetic variants on FS and possibly the pathogenesis of FA. Further epigenome-wide studies on larger samples combined with genome-wide genotyping are needed to validate the results and verify the biological potential of these CpG sites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".