IMpact of therapY using coleSevelam treatment reducing bile acids in patients with fonTan cIrCulation (MYSTIC): Rationale and study design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RATIONALE: Patients with a Fontan circulation suffer from progressive multiorgan dysfunction, yet central biochemical drivers remain poorly defined. Our recent work exploring metabolomic analyses have identified - elevated circulating bile acids (BAs) in adult Fontan patients compared with healthy controls. Elevated BAs, especially secondary and hydrophobic ones produced by the gut microbiome were found to correlate with worse exercise capacity, greater frailty, and impaired hemodynamics. PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS: Bile acid accumulation may contribute to Fontan pathophysiology. Colesevelam, a nonabsorbed bile acid sequestrant, offers a potential targeted therapy to reduce BA levels and interrupt this disease pathway. DESIGN: The MYSTIC trial is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over pilot study in 25 adult Fontan patients (with 25 age- and sex-matched healthy controls for baseline comparisons) to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of colesevelam in lowering plasma BA levels. Primary outcomes include safety/tolerability and change in total plasma BA levels. Secondary outcomes include changes in noninvasive hemodynamics, gut microbiome composition, fecal bile acid excretion, and biochemical profiles. SITES: Single center. ESTIMATED ENROLLMENT: 25 patients and 25 healthy subjects. ENROLLMENT DATES: September 2025 to August 2027. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06197763 This manuscript describes the rationale and design of the MYSTIC study, which to our knowledge is the first interventional trial targeting a Fontan-specific metabolic derangement. The results will inform the feasibility of BA sequestration therapy in Fontan patients and guide future larger studies aimed at improving outcomes in this growing high-risk population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".