MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413318599 · doi:10.1007/s10637-025-01573-0

Phase 1/2, open-label study of oral bacterial supplementation (EDP1503) plus pembrolizumab in participants with advanced or metastatic microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer, triple-negative breast cancer, and checkpoint inhibitor–relapsed tumors

2025· article· en· W4413318599 on OpenAlexaff
Judy S. Wang, Edward Arrowsmith, J. Thaddeus Beck, Jennifer Friedmann, Rahima Jamal, Duncan McHale, Humphrey Gardner, Michael Chisamore, Susanna V. Ulahannan

Bibliographic record

VenueInvestigational New Drugs · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineColorectal cancerTriple-negative breast cancerInternal medicineOncologyBreast cancerMetastatic breast cancerOpen labelCancerCancer researchImmunotherapyClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a phase 1/2 study evaluating EDP1503 (capsule containing Bifidobacterium animalis lactis) ± pembrolizumab in participants with microsatellite-stable colorectal cancer (MSS CRC), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), or other tumor types that relapsed after responding to immunotherapy (KEYNOTE-939/EDP1503-101; NCT03775850). Participants (≥ 18 years) had confirmed advanced/metastatic tumors and progressive disease (PD), were intolerant/nonresponsive to recommended treatment, and had measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Cohorts were: MSS CRC (Cohort A), metastatic/locally advanced TNBC (Cohort B), and PD following partial response/stable disease for ≥ 6 months during anti‒PD-(L)1 therapy (≥ 8 months during anti‒PD-(L)1 therapy plus chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer) (Cohort C). Participants received oral EDP1503 (2 or 4 capsules twice daily [BID]) for 2 weeks, then EDP1503 (2 or 4 capsules BID) plus intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks until PD, participant withdrawal, investigator decision, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 35 cycles. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability, objective response rate (RECIST v1.1), and immune-response rate. Secondary endpoints included duration of clinical benefit, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Of 69 participants, objective responses were observed in 3 (2 in Cohort B and 1 in Cohort C with partial responses received 4 capsules BID). For participants receiving 4 capsules BID, median duration of clinical benefit (95% CI) was 8.7 months (5.5 months‒not evaluable), median PFS was 1.8 (1.7‒1.9) months, and median OS was 7.8 (2.5‒13.5) months. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in 28 participants (40.6%), with no new safety signals. EDP1503 plus pembrolizumab had manageable safety but limited clinical activity.Trial registration: KEYNOTE-939, EDP1503-101 trial: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03775850.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInvestigational New DrugsSame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207