MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413324975 · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.08.126

Design of high H2-permeable Nb-based alloy membranes using a simple physical-chemical parameter matching approach

2025· article· en· W4413324975 on OpenAlexaff
Erhu Yan, Hongfei Chen, Kexiang Zhang, Lizhen Tao, Guanzhong Huang, Dongshuai Ma, Yinghao Li, Kangxing Liao, Hailiang Chu, Huanzhi Zhang, Lixian Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Research and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGuangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials
KeywordsMaterials scienceAlloyMembraneSimple (philosophy)Matching (statistics)Chemical engineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alloys containing Group VB metals represent a promising alternative to commercially available Pd-based membranes. However, eliminating the need for complex trial-and-error experiments and accurately predicting suitable alloys using simple empirical rules remains a significant challenge. To address this, a series of Nb-based alloys with the composition Nb 30 Ti 35 Co 30 M 5 (at.%, where M = Fe, Al, or Au) was developed in this study using a physical-chemical parameter matching (PCPM) design strategy for the first time. The structure, morphology, and hydrogen permeability of the alloys were characterised using X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and other techniques. The results indicate that all doped samples exhibit a dual-phase structure similar to that of Nb 30 Ti 35 Co 35 . However, samples containing Fe and Al display a hypereutectic structure, characterised by the formation of a primary BCC-(Nb, Ti, M) phase. Notably, the samples that conform to the PCPM rules exhibit good hydrogen permeability. At each test temperature, their permeabilities follow the order: Nb 30 Ti 35 Co 30 Fe 5 > Nb 30 Ti 35 Co 35 > Nb 30 Ti 35 Co 30 Al 5 . In contrast, the H 2 flux of the Au-containing specimen, which does not conform to the PCPM rules, remains close to zero throughout the test – even at temperatures as high as 673K. Among the tested alloys, Nb 30 Ti 35 Co 30 Fe 5 exhibits a hydrogen permeability of 2.69 × 10 −8 mol H 2 m −1 s −1 Pa −0.5 at 673K, surpassing that of most Nb-based membranes. This high permeability is attributed to a specific orientation relationship. These findings provide novel insights into the design of highly H 2 -permeable Nb-based alloy membranes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Research and TechnologySame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207