Pariwisata Sirkular: Tinjauan Literatur tentang Konsep dan Implikasinya terhadap Keberlanjutan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The development of the tourism sector is currently still oriented towards economic benefits. Meanwhile, climate change continues to occur as a result of development, including in the tourism sector. In this regard, a sustainable tourism approach that considers not only the economy but also the environment has developed significantly, but one concept that has not been explored much is circular tourism. This study explores the concept of a circular tourism approach as an alternative concept for tourism development and its implications for sustainable development, particularly in rural areas, based on a desk study. The study employs a literature review method focused on examining current literature, narrative synthesis, and analysis centered on the conceptualization of circular tourism and its implications for the sustainability of rural development. The analysis results show that circular tourism emphasizes seven main principles, particularly in the context of sustainable rural development, including: resource efficiency, environmental and cultural preservation, waste reduction, local economic empowerment, multi-stakeholder collaboration, education and awareness, and innovation and technology utilization in tourism development. These principles form the foundation for achieving circularity in tourism elements involving various stakeholders. In rural development, circular tourism serves as a development approach capable of promoting the achievement of sustainable development goals related to responsible consumption and production (SDG 12). Abstrak. Pengembangan sektor pariwisata saat ini masih berorientasi pada kebermanfaatan ekonomi. Sementara itu, perubahan iklim terus belangsung akibat pembangunan, termasuk pada sektor pariwisata. Berkaitan dengan itu, pendekatan pariwisata berkelanjutan yang memperhatikan bukan hanya ekonomi tetapi juga lingkungan sudah banyak berkembang, tetapi salah satu yang belum banyak dieksplorasi yaitu konsep pariwisata sirkular. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi konsep pendekatan pariwisata sirkular sebagai alternatif konsep pengembangan pariwisata dan implikasinya terhadap keberlanjutan pembangunan, khususnya di perdesaan berdasarkan desk study. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode literatur review yang berfokus pada pemeriksaan literatur terkini, sintesa bersifat naratif, dan analisis berfokus pada konseptualisasi dari pariwisata sirkular dan implikasi penerapannya terhadap keberlanjutan pembangunan perdesaan. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa pariwisata sirkular mengedepankan 7 (tujuh) prinsip utama khususnya dalam konteks keberlanjutan pembangunan perdesaan, antara lain: efisiensi penggunaan sumber daya, pelestarian lingkungan dan budaya, pengurangan limbah, pemberdayaan ekonomi lokal, kolaborasi multipihak, edukasi dan kesadaran, serta inovasi dan pemanfaatan teknologi dalam pembangunan pariwisata. Prinsip tersebut menjadi pondasi dalam mewujudkan sirkularitas unsur – unsur pariwisata yang melibatkan berbagai pihak. Dalam pembangunan perdesaan, pariwisata sirkular menjadi pendekatan pembangunan yang mampu mendorong terwujudnya tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan dalam hal konsumsi dan produksi yang bertanggung jawab (SDGs 12).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".