Evaluasi Kinerja Teknik Operasional Pengelolaan Persampahan Kota Tual di Kecamatan Pulau Dullah Selatan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. South Dullah Island District, as the administrative and economic center of Tual City with 50,842 residents, generates high daily waste. However, waste management faces major issues, including lack of standard TPS, damaged communal containers, and limited transport fleets. This study evaluates operational waste management performance based on SNI 19-2454-2002 using a qualitative descriptive method across six variables. Data were collected through observation and interviews, then analyzed for conformity level. Results show an average performance of 47.5% ("Not Suitable"), with only final disposal (93.7%) nearing the standard. Strategic planning is needed for effective and sustainable island-based waste management. Abstrak. Kecamatan Pulau Dullah Selatan merupakan pusat pemerintahan dan ekonomi Kota Tual dengan jumlah penduduk 50.842 jiwa, yang menghasilkan timbulan sampah harian cukup tinggi. Namun, pengelolaan sampah menghadapi berbagai kendala seperti ketiadaan TPS standar, rusaknya wadah komunal, dan terbatasnya armada pengangkut, yang menyebabkan pencemaran lingkungan dan rendahnya efisiensi layanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi kinerja teknik operasional pengelolaan sampah berdasarkan SNI 19-2454-2002 dengan metode deskriptif kualitatif dan pendekatan evaluatif pada enam variabel: pelayanan, pewadahan, pengumpulan, pengangkutan, pengolahan, dan pembuangan akhir. Data diperoleh melalui observasi dan wawancara, kemudian dianalisis secara komparatif terhadap standar untuk menentukan tingkat kesesuaian. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa kinerja operasional rata-rata hanya mencapai 47,5% dan tergolong “Tidak Sesuai”. Hanya variabel pembuangan akhir yang mendekati standar (93,7%), sementara pelayanan (6,6%) dan pengolahan (8%) sangat rendah. Diperlukan strategi pengelolaan berbasis karakteristik wilayah kepulauan agar sistem lebih efektif dan berkelanjutan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".