MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413332866 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v5i2.20732

Kajian Infrastruktur Drainase terhadap Permasalahan Banjir di Kawasan Cibaduyut, Kecamatan Bojongloa Kidul, Kota Bandung

2025· article· en· W4413332866 on OpenAlexaff
Andi Isra Muhaefa, Ernady Syaodih, Rama Arianto Widagdo

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater and Land Management
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryGeographyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Bandung City, as one of the largest cities in Indonesia, faces recurring flooding problems, particularly in the Cibaduyut area, which is a priority flood-prone area. This study aims to identify the condition of the drainage network that causes flooding in the Cibaduyut area. Data collection methods were conducted through questionnaires, field observations, literature studies, and institutional surveys. The analytical methods used were flood discharge analysis and hydraulic analysis, which were used to describe the planned flood discharge and flow velocity. The variables studied included topography and slope, rainfall, and channel conditions. The results showed that the existing drainage system had a low capacity, only able to accommodate approximately 30% of the planned flood discharge of 3.22 m³/s. Meanwhile, channel capacity analysis showed a mismatch between the needs and the channel's capacity to accommodate runoff. Through channel redesign planning with increased dimensions, the flow capacity increased to 3.8 m³/s and was able to optimally accommodate the planned flood discharge. Abstrak. Kota Bandung sebagai salah satu kota terbesar di Indonesia menghadapi permasalahan banjir berulang, khususnya di Kawasan Cibaduyut yang merupakan salah satu titik rawan banjir prioritas. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kondisi jaringan drainase yang menjadi penyebab banjir di Kawasan Cibaduyut. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui kuesioner, observasi lapangan, studi literatur, dan survei institusional. Metode analisis yang digunakan ialah analisis analisis debit banjir dan analisis hidrolik yang digunakan untuk menggambarkan debit banjir rencana dan kecepatan aliran. Variabel yang dikaji meliputi topografi dan kemiringan, curah hujan, dan kondisi saluran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sistem drainase eksisting memiliki kapasitas yang rendah, hanya mampu menampung sekitar 30% dari debit banjir rencana sebesar 3,22 m³/detik. Sementara itu, analisis kapasitas saluran menunjukkan ketidaksesuaian antara kebutuhan dan kemampuan saluran dalam menampung limpasan. Melalui perencanaan desain ulang saluran dengan peningkatan dimensi, kapasitas aliran meningkat menjadi 3,8 m³/detik dan mampu mengakomodasi debit banjir rencana secara optimal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicWater and Land ManagementFrench-language works237,207