MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Growth Without Mobility? Reproduction of Social Hierarchies in China’s Reform Era

2025· article· en· W4413335032 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Economics Management and Political Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReproductionSocial mobilitySocial reproductionSocial reformPolitical scienceSociologyBiologySocial scienceEcologyLawSocial capital

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past four decades, China has experienced unprecedented rapid economic growth, with surging output, accelerated urbanization, improved access to education, and technological innovation collectively driving the country toward modernization. An increasing number of young people have found that individual effort alone cannot overcome structural barriers to the resources. Social phenomena such as “poverty traps,” “exam fever,” “school district housing,” and “lying flat ideology” reflect the ongoing exacerbation of social inequality. This paper adopts Bourdieu's theory of capital and social reproduction as its analytical framework, focusing on the accumulation and transmission mechanisms of economic capital, cultural capital, and social capital across generations, and on how these mechanisms shape individuals' social mobility pathways. Through the combination of statistical data and regional case studies, this paper reveals that Chinese society is gradually evolving from a “mobile society” to a “stratified society.” Specifically, the imbalance in development between eastern, central, and western regions has caused structural fractures in mobility opportunities; the urban-rural dichotomy has led to a marked concentration of educational resources among the urban middle class and elite groups; and skyrocketing housing prices have emerged as a new barrier to mobility. Additionally, “relationship capital” often proves more critical than individual ability in the job market, further compressing the upward mobility space for the lower strata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Economics Management and Political SciencesSame topicChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207