MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413338826 · doi:10.1002/tpg2.70091

Genome‐wide association analysis of winter survival in a diverse Canadian winter wheat population

2025· article· en· W4413338826 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rachel Whiting, Alexandra Ficht, Yi Chen, Davoud Torkamaneh, Joseph Colasanti, E.M. Lyons

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Plant Genome · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalMinistère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'AlimentationUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsBiologyQuantitative trait locusAssociation mappingGermplasmAlleleVernalizationPopulationWinter wheatGeneticsGenotypeAgronomyGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vrn-A1 (VERNALIZATION A1) and Fr-A2 (FROST RESISTANCE A2) have been associated with variation in winter survival of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The beneficial alleles of Vrn-A1 and Fr-A2 are largely fixed in Canadian winter wheat germplasm, rendering the associated molecular markers ineffective for marker-assisted selection (MAS) in elite populations. The objectives were to (i) identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for winter survival in eastern Canada and determine their usefulness for MAS and (ii) explore the underlying genetic mechanisms of superior winter survival in the region. A subpopulation (n = 321) of the Canadian Winter Wheat Diversity Panel, consisting of genotypes that were fixed for the beneficial alleles of vrn-A1 and Fr-A2, was previously evaluated for winter survival in three eastern Canadian environments (Elora 2016-2017, CÉROM 2017-2018, and Elora 2017-2018). Genome-wide association mapping identified three significant QTLs for winter survival, a previously identified QTL on chromosome 5A, and two novel QTLs on chromosomes 5D and 7B. These QTLs were of low-to-moderate marker utility (0.1473-0.4796) and conferred a 0.7%-1.8% increase in mean winter survival. In silico analyses revealed that an array of biotic and abiotic stress responses are implicated in winter survival in eastern Canada, which challenges the notion that lethal temperature is the primary cause of winterkill in some regions. As significant winterkill events are sporadic in the region, it may be beneficial to identify individual components of winter survival that can be examined in artificial environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Plant GenomeSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207