Analisis Inkonsistensi Pemanfaatan Ruang di Kawasan Sub-DAS Ciwidey Kabupaten Bandung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Uncontrolled regional development in the Ciwidey Sub-watershed area has caused land conversion, from protected areas to cultivated areas, this situation is contrary to efforts to maintain water catchment areas as the function of the Ciwidey Sub-watershed area. This study aims to determine the existing condition of land use and its level of conformity with the Bandung Regency Spatial Plan (RTRW) in the Ciwidey Sub-watershed area using a quantitative approach method with the analysis used being land inconsistency map overlay analysis. The results of the study, from a total area of 27,825.85 Ha of the Ciwidey Sub-watershed, show that 15.94% of the land experiences spatial inconsistencies. The main deviations are the conversion of protected areas into settlements and the conversion of production forests into fields/dry fields. The main causal factors are urbanization pressure, community economic needs, and weak control of spatial use. Therefore, a comprehensive and firm control approach is needed, mitigation strategies must focus on equitable development. Abstrak. Perkembangan wilayah pada kawasan Sub-DAS Ciwidey yang tidak terkendali menyebabkan alih fungsi lahan, dari kawasan lindung menjadi kawasan budidaya, keadaan tersebut bertolak belakang dengan upaya mempertahankan kawasan resapan air sebagaimana fungsi dari kawasan Sub DAS Ciwidey. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kondisi eksisting penggunaan lahan serta tingkat kesesuaiannya dengan RTRW Kabupaten Bandung di kawasan Sub-DAS Ciwidey. Metode pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis yang digunakan yaitu nalisis overlay peta inkonsistensi lahan. Hasil dari penelitian , dari total luas 27.825,85 Ha Sub-DAS Ciwidey, menunjukkan 15,94% lahan mengalami inkonsistensi tata ruang. Penyimpangan utama berupa konversi kawasan lindung menjadi permukiman dan alih fungsi hutan produksi menjadi ladang/tegalan. Sehingga kedepannya harus dilakukan analisis faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya alih fungsi lahan dan strategi apa saja yang tepat agar alih fungsi lahan di SUB-DAS Ciwidey dapat terkendali dan tidak terus mengalami kerusakan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".