Strategi Pengembangan Kawasan Ekowisata Gunung Galunggung Kabupaten Tasikmalaya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The Galunggung Mountain Ecotourism Area possesses significant potential in natural, geological, and cultural aspects, yet has experienced inadequate tourism infrastructure development, limited to basic facility maintenance. Despite being designated as Tasikmalaya Regency's prime tourism destination in late 2018, comprehensive development remains insufficient. This research aims to formulate development strategies for Galunggung Mountain Ecotourism Area as a leading tourism destination using a mixedmethod approach through, Importance Performance Analysis, and SWOT analysis. IPA results reveal comprehensively low tourist satisfaction levels, with all 4A components requiring development. However, amenities emerged as the primary priority factor needing immediate improvement. The formulated strategy integrates ecotourism concepts with educational tourism, presenting new development opportunities through additional attractions, specifically a geological museum. This museum concept encompasses eruption history displays, volcanological processes of volcanic formation, and hot spring features. Subsequent strategies focus on enhancing existing objects, infrastructure, and management practices through routine maintenance activities, environmental cleanliness preservation, and active tourism promotion via social media utilization. This comprehensive approach addresses both immediate infrastructure needs and long-term sustainability objectives, positioning Galunggung Mountain as a competitive ecotourism destination that balances conservation with educational value and visitor satisfaction. Abstrak. Kawasan Ekowisata Gunung Galunggung memiliki potensi yang besar, dari aspek alam, geologi, dan budaya lokal, namun dari tahun ke tahun belum mengalami pengembangan infrastruktur wisata yang memadai, hanya terbatas pada perbaikan dan pemeliharaan sarana prasarana dasar. Selain itu Ekowisata Gunung Galunggung telah ditetapkan sebagai destinasi wisata unggulan Kabupaten Tasikmalaya pada akhir tahun 2018 oleh pemerintah daerah Kabupaten Tasikmalaya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merumuskan strategi pengembangan Kawasan ekowisata Gunung Galunggung sebagai destinasi wisata unggulan. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan campuran (mixed method) melalui analisis, Importance Performance Analysis, dan SWOT. Hasil analisis IPA menunjukan bahwa tingkat kepuasan wisatawan masih rendah secara menyeluruh serta seluruh komponen 4A dinilai penting untuk dikembangkan tetapi faktor prioritas utama yang perlu segera ditingkatkan dan dikembangkan saat ini adalah amenitas. Berdasarkan hasil analisis tersebut strategi yang dirumuskan yaitu mengintegrasikan konsep ekowisata dengan edukasi wisata. Edukasi wisata menjadi peluang baru pengembangan kawasan wisata Gunung Galunggung melalui penambahan atraksi baru berupa museum geologi. Konsep museum ini mencakup penampilan sejarah letusan, proses vulkanologi pembentukan gunung api, air panas. Strategi berikutnya peningkatan terhadap objek, sarana-prasarana serta manajemen pengelolaan guna mempertahankan komponen yang sudah ada melalui kegiatan maintanance rutin, menjaga kebersihan lingkungan wisata serta giat promosi wisata melalui pemanfaatan media sosial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".