Kajian Kelayakan Finansial Industrial Park Kecamatan Cipeundeuy, Kabupaten Subang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. This study analyzes the financial feasibility of a large-scale integrated industrial estate over a 20-year projection period, based on systematically simulated cash flows and operational structures. The project demonstrates strong Net Cash Flow (NCF) performance, averaging Rp140–160 billion annually, and generates consistent net profits under a 70% margin assumption. Present Value (PV) assessments of both revenues and costs reveal positive Net Present Value (NPV) in 19 of 20 years, with a cumulative NPV exceeding Rp700 billion. Although the final year shows a minor negative NPV due to discounting effects, the project overall reflects a healthy return trajectory. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is calculated at 18.62%, surpassing common industry benchmarks. The project achieves break-even between years 5 and 7, indicating early capital recovery and strong investment viability. These results confirm the financial sustainability and profitability of the estate, recommending its advancement to implementation and commercial development phases. Abstrak. Penelitian ini menganalisis kelayakan finansial dari kawasan industri di Kecamatan Cipeundeuy selama periode proyeksi 20 tahun, berdasarkan simulasi sistematis terhadap arus kas dan struktur operasional proyek. Proyek menunjukkan kinerja Net Cash Flow (NCF) yang kuat dengan rata-rata Rp140–160 miliar per tahun, dan menghasilkan laba bersih yang konsisten dengan asumsi margin sebesar 70%. Hasil perhitungan nilai kini (PV) terhadap pendapatan dan biaya menunjukkan NPV tahunan positif selama 19 dari 20 tahun, dengan akumulasi NPV melebihi Rp700 miliar. Meskipun tahun terakhir menunjukkan NPV negatif yang kecil akibat efek diskonto, secara keseluruhan proyek mencerminkan jalur pengembalian investasi yang sehat. Internal Rate of Return (IRR) tercatat sebesar 18,62%, melampaui standar umum industri properti. Break-even point tercapai pada tahun ke-5 hingga ke-7, menunjukkan pemulihan modal awal yang cepat dan kelayakan investasi yang kuat. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa proyek memiliki keberlanjutan finansial dan profitabilitas jangka panjang yang memadai, serta direkomendasikan untuk dilanjutkan ke tahap implementasi dan pengembangan komersial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".