Pengaruh Strategi Koping terhadap Quarter Life Crisis pada Mahasiswa di Kota Bandung
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Quarter life crisis (QLC) is a psychological phenomenon commonly experienced by individuals aged 20–30, marked by confusion about life direction, social pressure, and uncertainty about the future. This condition may hinder developmental tasks and readiness for post-college life. This study aimed to determine the level of QLC and examine the influence of coping strategies on QLC among final-year university students. A quantitative approach with a causal design was used, supported by informal interviews. The participants were 410 final-year students from top-accredited universities in Bandung, selected through convenience sampling. Data were collected using the Quarter Life Crisis Scale and the Brief COPE Inventory, and analyzed using non-linear regression. The results showed that most students were at a moderate level of QLC. The dominant coping strategy used was emotion-focused coping. Regression results indicated a significant influence of coping strategies on QLC (p < 0.05), accounting for 5.8% of the variance. Interview data supported this finding, showing that students often stabilize their emotions before addressing problems directly. The study concludes that while coping strategies play a role in reducing QLC intensity, other psychological factors also contribute. Preventive psychological interventions are recommended to help students manage the pressures of early adulthood. Abstrak. Quarter life crisis (QLC) merupakan fase krisis psikologis yang umumnya dialami oleh individu usia 20–30 tahun, ditandai oleh kebingungan arah hidup, tekanan sosial, serta ketidakpastian masa depan. Fenomena ini menjadi urgensi tersendiri karena dapat menghambat pencapaian tugas perkembangan dan kesiapan menghadapi dunia pascakampus. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tingkat QLC serta menganalisis pengaruh strategi koping terhadap QLC pada mahasiswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain kausalitas. Subjek penelitian berjumlah 410 mahasiswa tingkat akhir dari perguruan tinggi berakreditasi unggul yang dipilih menggunakan teknik convenience sampling. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah Quarter Life Crisis Scale dan Brief COPE Inventory. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui penyebaran kuesioner daring. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji regresi non-linear. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mayoritas mahasiswa berada pada kategori QLC sedang. Strategi koping yang paling dominan digunakan adalah emotion-focused coping. Hasil uji menunjukkan bahwa strategi koping berpengaruh signifikan 5,8%. Temuan ini diperkuat oleh wawancara yang menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa cenderung menstabilkan emosi terlebih dahulu sebelum menyelesaikan masalah secara langsung. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa strategi koping berperan dalam mengurangi intensitas QLC, namun bukan satu-satunya faktor yang memengaruhinya. Oleh karena itu, disarankan adanya intervensi psikologis preventif untuk membantu mahasiswa dalam menghadapi tekanan perkembangan di fase dewasa awal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".