MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413343851 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v5i2.21158

Penilaian Kualitas Alun-Alun Temanggung pada Fungsi Sosial

2025· article· en· W4413343851 on OpenAlexaff
Galang Rachman Maulana, Verry Damayanti

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Public spaces are a forum for social interaction that is essential to community life. However, in practice, public space planning often prioritizes architectural design and aesthetics without considering its basic function. On the island of Java, the Alun-alun is a distinctive public space with significant historical value and social functions. This study focuses on the Alun-alun of Temanggung Regency, which underwent restructuring following the implementation of Regent Regulation No. 4 of 2018. These changes led to the Alun-alun becoming deserted due to the relocation of street vendors (PKL) and reduced accessibility. To examine this issue, the Good Public Space Index (GPSI) analysis method was used to determine the characteristics of public space user activities and the evaluation of the public space landscape. The analysis results indicate that the social function of the alun-alun has sufficient value. This suggests that the revitalization efforts were less successful and failed to meet the ideal criteria for public spaces. Abstrak. Ruang publik merupakan wadah interaksi sosial yang bagi kehidupan masyarakat. Namun dalam implementasinya, perencanaan ruang publik kerap mengedepankan aspek desain arsitektur dan estetika tanpa mempertimbangkan fungsi dasarnya. Di Pulau Jawa, Alun-alun merupakan ruang publik khas yang memiliki nilai historis dan fungsi sosial yang penting. Penelitian ini berfokus pada Alun-alun Kabupaten Temanggung yang mengalami perubahan penataan setelah diberlakukannya Peraturan Bupati Nomor 4 Tahun 2018. Perubahan tersebut menyebabkan keadaan alun-alun menjadi sepi karena terjadi pemindahan pedagang kaki lima (PKL) dan aksesbilitas yang semakin kecil. Untuk mengkaji permasalahan ini, digunakan metode analisis Good Public Space Index (GPSI) untuk mengetahui karakteristik aktivitas pengguna ruang publik dan penilaian lanskap ruang publik. Hasil analisis menunjukkan fungsi sosial alun-alun memiliki nilai yang cukup. Menunjukkan hasil revitalisasi kurang berhasil dan kurang memenuhi kriteria ideal raung publik.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207