Penilaian Kualitas Alun-Alun Temanggung pada Fungsi Sosial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Public spaces are a forum for social interaction that is essential to community life. However, in practice, public space planning often prioritizes architectural design and aesthetics without considering its basic function. On the island of Java, the Alun-alun is a distinctive public space with significant historical value and social functions. This study focuses on the Alun-alun of Temanggung Regency, which underwent restructuring following the implementation of Regent Regulation No. 4 of 2018. These changes led to the Alun-alun becoming deserted due to the relocation of street vendors (PKL) and reduced accessibility. To examine this issue, the Good Public Space Index (GPSI) analysis method was used to determine the characteristics of public space user activities and the evaluation of the public space landscape. The analysis results indicate that the social function of the alun-alun has sufficient value. This suggests that the revitalization efforts were less successful and failed to meet the ideal criteria for public spaces. Abstrak. Ruang publik merupakan wadah interaksi sosial yang bagi kehidupan masyarakat. Namun dalam implementasinya, perencanaan ruang publik kerap mengedepankan aspek desain arsitektur dan estetika tanpa mempertimbangkan fungsi dasarnya. Di Pulau Jawa, Alun-alun merupakan ruang publik khas yang memiliki nilai historis dan fungsi sosial yang penting. Penelitian ini berfokus pada Alun-alun Kabupaten Temanggung yang mengalami perubahan penataan setelah diberlakukannya Peraturan Bupati Nomor 4 Tahun 2018. Perubahan tersebut menyebabkan keadaan alun-alun menjadi sepi karena terjadi pemindahan pedagang kaki lima (PKL) dan aksesbilitas yang semakin kecil. Untuk mengkaji permasalahan ini, digunakan metode analisis Good Public Space Index (GPSI) untuk mengetahui karakteristik aktivitas pengguna ruang publik dan penilaian lanskap ruang publik. Hasil analisis menunjukkan fungsi sosial alun-alun memiliki nilai yang cukup. Menunjukkan hasil revitalisasi kurang berhasil dan kurang memenuhi kriteria ideal raung publik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".