A prognostic signature for lung adenocarcinoma in people who have never smoked
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Knowledge of tumor cell dynamics can inform prognosis and treatment yet is largely lacking for lung adenocarcinoma in people who have never smoked (NS-LUAD). With RNA-seq data from 684 NS-LUAD and validation in an independent dataset, we identified three subtypes with distinct phenotypic traits and cell compositions. Additional genomic and histological data further characterized the subtypes. ‘Steady’ , marked by low proliferation, high alveolar cell fraction, moderate-to-well differentiation, and fewer driver genes’ alterations, is linked to prolonged survival and low immune evasion. ‘Proliferative ’ shows high proliferation markers, TP53 mutations, and gene fusions. ‘Chaotic’ , with high epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers, has the worst prognosis even within stage I tumors. Lacking known molecular or histological characteristics, this aggressive subtype is solely identified by transcriptomic data. A 60-gene signature recapitulates the overall classification and strongly predicts survival even within subgroups based on tumor stage or known genomic features, emphasizing its potential for improving NS-LUAD prognostication in clinical settings. Significance The transcriptome of 684 lung adenocarcinomas in people who have never smoked (NS-LUAD) identifies three subtypes with different cellular dynamics, and genomic and morphologic features. A 60-gene signature accurately stratifies subjects for mortality risk, even in stage I, offering a clinically applicable tool for treatment decision making in NS-LUAD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".