MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413345683 · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2025.2957

Long-Term Durability of Active Surveillance of Small, Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Cancer

2025· letter· en· W4413345683 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anna M. Sawka, Sangeet Ghai, Lorne Rotstein, Jonathan C. Irish, Jesse D. Pasternak, Eric Monteiro, Janet Chung, Jie Su, Wei Xu, Alex O. Esemezie, Jennifer M. Jones, Amiram Gafni, Nancy N. Baxter, David P. Goldstein, Avik Banerjee, Vinita Bindlish, Maky Hafidh, Jose Prudencio, Vinod Bharadwaj, Denny Lin, Laura Whiteacre, Eric Arruda, Artur Gevorgyan, Marshall Hay, Philip Solomon, Karen Hernandez, Allan Vescan, Ian Witterick, Everton Gooden, Manish D. Shah, Michael Chang, Andres Gantous, Jennifer Anderson, Vinay T. Fernandes, Sumeet Anand, Danny Enepekides, Antoine Eskander, Ilana Halperin, Kevin Higgins, Karim Nazarali, Lorne Segall, John R. de Almeida, Shereen Ezzat, Ralph Gilbert, Patrick Gullane, Amin Madani, Richard Tsang, Mark Korman, Karen Devon, Afshan Zahedi

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Surgery · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsImpactPublic Health OntarioTrillium Health CentreMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMcMaster UniversityWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThyroid cancerContext (archaeology)Papillary thyroid cancerProspective cohort studyCancerCohortInternal medicinePediatricsSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: In managing early-stage cancers, active surveillance (AS) may be preferentially favored by older individuals. In counseling patients, it is important to understand the durability of AS in the context of age. Objective: To evaluate the durability of AS in patients with small, low-risk papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) according to age at the time of choosing AS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center, prospective, long-term follow-up cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Adult patients with small, localized, low-risk PTC less than 2 cm in maximal diameter were enrolled between May 2016 and February 2021. The clinical outcome data were analyzed up to the time point of May 25, 2025, and final data analysis was performed in June 2025. Exposure: All patients were offered the choice of AS or thyroid surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the overall rate of AS crossover to definitive treatment (treatment completed or recommended by an investigator) and the indications. Cumulative crossover incidence function curves were examined according to age, with death from other causes as the competing risk. Results: A total of 200 patients (155 patients under AS and 45 who had immediate surgery) were followed up for a median (IQR) duration of 71 (59-84) months. Overall mean (SD) age was 52.0 (14.9) years, and 153 patients (76.5%) were female. There were no observed thyroid cancer-related deaths or any distant metastatic disease. The overall crossover rate from AS was 23.9% (37/155; 32 completed treatment, 3 declined surgery for disease progression, and 2 awaiting treatment). Crossover reasons included disease progression (56.8% [21/37]), patient preference (40.5% [15/37]), and ultrasound imaging limitations precluding accurate tumor measurement under active surveillance (tumor border not clearly distinguishable from heterogeneous echotexture of the thyroid parenchyma in a patient with Hashimoto thyroiditis; 2.6% [1/37]). The 5-year age-stratified cumulative overall crossover incidence rates were 41.5% (95% CI, 25.6%-56.8%) in patients younger than 45 years, 20.9% (95% CI, 12.3%-31.1%) in those aged 45 to 64 years, and 5.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-15.2%) in those aged 65 years and older (P < .001). Conclusion and Relevance: This single-center Canadian cohort study found that AS is a durable long-term management strategy for small, low -risk PTC, particularly in older individuals. Older individuals may be less likely to cross over to surgery after choosing AS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.405
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA SurgerySame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207