MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Behavioral Activation for Perinatal Suicide Ideation

2025· article· en· W4413345768 on OpenAlexaffabout
Parisa R. Kaliush, Nicolette C. Molina, Tara Berenbaum, Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Bradley N. Gaynes, Samantha Meltzer‐Brody, Mae Lynn Reyes‐Rodríguez, Richard K. Silver, Alison M. Stuebe, Simone N. Vigod, Crystal Edler Schiller, Daisy R. Singla

Bibliographic record

VenueJAMA Psychiatry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEdinburgh Postnatal Depression ScaleMedicineSuicidal ideationPostpartum depressionRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionDepression (economics)Poison controlPsychiatrySuicide preventionPregnancyEmergency medicineDepressive symptomsInternal medicineAnxiety

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Importance: Suicide is a leading cause of maternal postpartum death. Evidence-based interventions are needed. Objective: To determine whether the likelihood of endorsing suicide ideation (SI) changed during a brief behavioral activation (BA) psychotherapy for perinatal depression irrespective of clinician or delivery types. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a secondary analysis of a multisite, noninferiority, 4-arm randomized clinical trial called SUMMIT(Scaling Up Maternal Mental Health Care by Increasing Access to Treatment). SUMMIT compared clinicians (nonspecialist vs specialist) and modalities (telemedicine vs in person) in delivering BA. Participants were enrolled from January 2020 to October 2023. The study was conducted at university-affiliated networks in Chicago, Illinois; Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and Toronto, Canada. Pregnant (≤36 weeks) and postpartum (4-30 weeks) adults with depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS] score ≥10) were enrolled. Secondary data analyses were conducted in November 2024. Intervention: A manualized 6- to 8-session perinatal BA intervention delivered weekly. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was SI, as measured by the EPDS item 10, assessed weekly and at 3 months postrandomization. SI endorsements were followed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) for further safety assessment. Results: A total of 1230 pregnant and postpartum adults were enrolled, among whom 1117 completed 1 or more treatment session and provided 1 or more week of EPDS data and thus were included in the current study. Of 1117 included participants, 264 (23.6%) endorsed SI during treatment, and mean (SD) age was 33.4 (4.9) years. Cumulative link mixed models indicated that the odds of endorsing SI decreased by 25% with each additional treatment session (odds ratio [OR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96; P = .03). The odds of endorsing SI decreased by 80% at 3 months postrandomization compared with any time during treatment (OR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.14-0.27; P < .001). The odds of endorsing SI did not differ between clinician type (nonspecialist vs specialist) or modality (telemedicine vs in person). Goodness-of-fit χ2 tests further indicated that participants were significantly more likely to endorse suicide thoughts on the C-SSRS at treatment onset compared with any other time point. Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the SUMMIT noninferiority randomized clinical trial, the likelihood of endorsing SI decreased over the course of a brief BA psychotherapy for perinatal depression and most significantly at 3 months postrandomization, irrespective of clinician or delivery types. BA may be one evidence-based, scalable approach for perinatal suicide prevention. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04153864.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAMA PsychiatrySame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207