MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413346841 · doi:10.1021/jacsau.5c00823

Dynamic Single-Atom Catalysts on Gallium To Overcome the Scaling Relationship Limit: AIMD Screening for CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions

2025· article· en· W4413346841 on OpenAlex
Mohsen Tamtaji, William A. Goddard, Ziyang Hu, Shuguang Chen, GuanHua Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJACS Au · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsProcess Simulations Limited (Canada)
FundersDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsInnovation and Technology CommissionResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee
KeywordsGalliumCatalysisReduction (mathematics)ScalingLimit (mathematics)Materials scienceAtom (system on chip)HydrogenNanotechnologyChemical physicsChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsComputer scienceParallel computingMathematicsQuantum mechanicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Extensive research has been conducted on single-atom catalysts (SACs) for a range of electrochemical reactions. However, static SACs suffer from scaling relationship limits, which hinder their further development. In this work, we introduce the idea of dynamic SACs supported on Gallium for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and the CO 2 reduction reaction (CO 2 RR). We utilized AIMD and DFT calculations to systematically conduct high-throughput screening on s-, p-, d-, and f-block elements supported by Gallium denoted as M-SAC@Ga. We found that among all the understudied catalysts, Re-, Pt-, Pd-, Rh-, Ir-, Au-, Ag-, Ru-, Tc-, Ni-, Cu-, Os-, Hg-, and Ge-SAC@Ga possess thermodynamic and electrochemical stabilities. In addition: Ni-SAC@Ga leads to CO 2 RR overpotentials of 0.28, 0.28, 0.69, and 0.92 V, respectively, toward CHOOH, CO, CH 3 OH, and CH 4 formation. Low overpotentials and mitigation of scaling relationship limits are primarily due to the atomic intelligence (the ability to guide reactions) and dynamic coordination changes of SACs, seen through DFT and AIMD calculations. Analyzing the phonon-induced fluctuations in total energies suggests a standard deviation of up to 0.26 V in the calculated overpotentials. Additionally, the dephasing time for these dynamic systems is below 5 fs, a crucial factor affecting the modeling of catalytic behavior. Feature importance analysis suggests that the d-electron numbers serve as the universal descriptors for these catalysts. This study offers a comprehensive insight into the discovery of cutting-edge electrocatalysts and beyond by applying the concept of dynamic SACs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it