BorFIT: A Novel LiDAR-Based Training Dataset for Individual Tree Segmentation and Species Detection in northern boreal Forests
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. BorFIT is a novel training data set designed to assist in the segmentation of individual trees and the detection of species from LiDAR point clouds, thus contributing to deep learning-based forestry applications. Recent advancements in AI-supported individual tree detection have shown significant progress; however, satisfactory results remain elusive in dense and structurally-complex boreal forests. We compiled a training data set designed to remedy this issue. It comprises 384 LiDAR point clouds, each with an area of 20 m × 20 m, in the form of reference plots, with up to 200 manually segmented and species classified trees per point cloud. We carried out LiDAR surveys at 146 sites between 2021 and 2024 in East Siberia (Yakutia), northwest Canada, and Alaska (USA), selected along a bioclimatic gradient to represent the circumboreal region. From each LiDAR transect derived point cloud, we extracted a minimum of four reference plots (each 20 m × 20 m) based on maximum tree heights within the plots to systematically sample the apparent tree density gradient. We manually segmented identifiable trees within each reference plot point cloud leading to 16,530 individual trees in total. Following segmentation, we trained four randomForest classifiers to predict the species of every segmented tree. The predicted tree species include: Picea mariana (Britton, Sterns Poggenb.), Picea sitchensis ((Bong.) Carrière), Picea glauca ((Moench) Voss), Pinus contorta (Douglas ex Loudon), Abies lasiocarpa ((Hook.) Nutt.), Larix laricina ((Du Roi) K.Koch), Betula papyrifera (Marshall), Betula neoalaskana ((Regel) Ashburner McAll.), Populus balsamifera (L.), Populus tremuloides (Michx.), Pinus sylvestris (Thunb.) and Alnus glutinosa ((L.). The data offer the means for 3D space analysis of species distribution and stand structure around the circumboreal region. Furthermore, it can be used as a training data set for artificial intelligence (AI) applications and thereby improve our understanding of the boreal forest’s vegetation reorganization in response to significant global warming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".