Exploring health system integration across public health and primary care programs in Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: While both public health entities and primary care play key roles in health promotion and prevention, complex challenges, such as lack of role clarity, gaps in governance and coordination, and resource constraints hinder health system integration efforts. Approach: We aim to explore opportunities to facilitate integration across public health and primary care for health promotion and prevention initiatives in Alberta. The study aim was informed through consultation with public health and primary care staff, leadership, and providers. Patient Co-Investigators play an important role in carrying out the following objectives:. Examine the landscape of public health and primary care integration internationally through an environmental scan. We identified factors influencing integration efforts between public health and primary care for health promotion and prevention initiatives in the academic and grey literature.2. Identify policy, system, and individual-level barriers and facilitators for integrating efforts in Alberta through qualitative interviews with public health and primary care staff, leadership, and providers. Interviews were conducted with patients and caregivers to understand their experiences with receiving care and support for health promotion and prevention. Results: This study is in progress, with Objectives and 2 underway. Preliminary findings from Objective include the identification of 72 initiatives across 6 countries, with two multi-country initiatives. System-level (macro) initiatives (e.g., pandemic response or national service coordination) accounted for 27% of initiatives. Organizational-level (meso) initiatives comprised 24% of initiatives (e.g., interdisciplinary care teams). Patient-provider-level (micro) initiatives were described in 49% of initiatives, including integrated behavioral health initiatives (e.g., health promotion education). To date, we interviewed 0 public health and primary care staff, leaders, and providers, and 5 patients and caregivers. Key factors influencing implementation of integration identified from Objectives and 2 include: shared vision/goals around health promotion and prevention, clarity around organizational and provider roles and responsibilities, differences in organizational/professional cultures, quality of relationships and partnerships (co-design as an important facilitator), financial compensation/reimbursement for integrated models, the need for governance, organizational structures, and processes for data sharing to support collaboration, and availability of staff. Patients and caregivers identified family doctors as a critical support for their health promotion and prevention goals, while other healthcare providers can also play an important role (e.g. pharmacists). Patients and caregivers emphasized the need for accessible, trusting, person-centred, and culturally sensitive care. Patients and caregivers reported needing to advocate for themselves; they want the system to provide accessible and reliable information. Implications: Based on the findings from Objectives and 2, we will conduct a consensus workshop with public health and primary care leaders, healthcare providers, and patients to co-design solutions towards health system integration in Alberta. These solutions need to address patient and caregiver needs regarding health promotion and prevention, including addressing system-level gaps to address issues related to accessibility of information and coordination of services. This project aligns with ongoing provincial initiatives to improve patient experiences and outcomes, and can provide practical guidance for strengthening integration efforts between public health and primary care organizations in Alberta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".