MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413358913 · doi:10.1038/s41390-025-04256-x

Comparative analysis of adaptive immunity to SARS-CoV-2 in infected children and adults

2025· article· en· W4413358913 on OpenAlexafffund
Sabryna Nantel, Corey Arnold, Maala Bhatt, Yannick Galipeau, Benoîte Bourdin, Jennifer Bowes, Roger Zemek, Marc‐André Langlois, Caroline Quach, Hélène Decaluwe, Anne Pham‐Huy

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCoalition for Epidemic Preparedness InnovationsUniversity of OttawaPublic Health AgencyPhysicians' Services Incorporated FoundationPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsImmune systemImmunityMedicineImmunologyAntibodyAcquired immune systemNeutralizationSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Young adultBiologyVirologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background SARS-CoV-2 infection in children is most often mild and resembles that of seasonal coronaviruses. Profiling the adaptive immune response following infection may help to inform on the protective mechanisms mediating immunity in children and adults. Methods Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses from unvaccinated pediatric and adult participants were analyzed following non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection. Specific T cell memory responses were investigated by quantifying interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) secreting cells after stimulation with ancestral and variant strains of SARS-CoV-2 and seasonal human β-coronaviruses (HCoV)-OC43 and -HKU1. Results Twenty-eight children (3–17 [median = 10] years) and 28 adults (19–62 [median = 42] years) were sampled at a mean time of 7 months (±2.8 months) after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antibody levels against spike (S) and the receptor-binding domain (RBD), as well as neutralization capacity, were equivalent in adults and children. However, children displayed a lower number of IFN-γ secreting T cells in response to SARS-CoV-2 compared to adults, with a median of 88 [28–184] spot-forming units (SFU) per million of cells in children compared to 208 [141–340] in adults ( P < 0.001). In children, the IFN-γ + responses to SARS-CoV-2 were of similar magnitude as the responses to seasonal β-coronaviruses ( P > 0.05). In contrast, adults exhibited heightened T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 than they did to HCoV-OC43 (median of 80 [45–135] SFU/10 6 cells, P < 0.0001) and HCoV-HKU1 (median of 98 [59–151] SFU/10 6 cells, P < 0.01). Conclusions In children, the functional T cell memory responses to SARS-CoV-2, assessed through IFN-γ secretion in response to peptide stimulation, are comparable to those of HCoVs and lower compared to adults. Impact While binding and neutralizing antibody levels to SARS-CoV-2 are largely comparable in children and adults, the strength of memory T cell responses induced by infection is reduced in children compared to adults. Adults present heightened cellular memory responses to SARS-CoV-2, but not to seasonal β-coronaviruses HCoV-OC43 and HCoV-HKU1. In contrast, children’s T cell memory responses to SARS-CoV-2 closely mirror their response to common seasonal β-coronaviruses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.015
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric ResearchSame topicSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchFrench-language works237,207