MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413360446 · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00021

BQSched: A Non-Intrusive Scheduler for Batch Concurrent Queries via Reinforcement Learning

2025· article· en· W4413360446 on OpenAlexaff
Chenhao Xu, Chunyu Chen, Jiannan Wang, Jun Gao

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningComputer scienceReinforcementDistributed computingParallel computingArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most large enterprises build predefined data pipelines and execute them periodically to process operational data using SQL queries for various tasks. A key issue in minimizing the overall makespan of these pipelines is the efficient scheduling of concurrent queries within the pipelines. Existing tools mainly rely on simple heuristic rules due to the difficulty of expressing the complex features and mutual influences of queries. The latest reinforcement learning (RL) based methods have the potential to capture these patterns from feedback, but it is non-trivial to apply them directly due to the large scheduling space, high sampling cost, and poor sample utilization. Motivated by these challenges, we propose BQSched, a non-intrusive Scheduler for Batch concurrent Queries via reinforcement learning. Specifically, BQSched designs an attention-based state representation to capture the complex query patterns, and proposes IQ-PPO, an auxiliary task-enhanced proximal policy optimization (PPO) algorithm, to fully exploit the rich signals of Individual Query completion in logs. Based on the RL framework above, BQSched further introduces three optimization strategies, including adaptive masking to prune the action space, scheduling gain-based query clustering to deal with large query sets, and an incremental simulator to reduce sampling cost. To our knowledge, BQSched is the first non-intrusive batch query scheduler via RL. Extensive experiments show that BQSched can significantly improve the efficiency and stability of batch query scheduling, while also achieving remarkable scalability and adaptability in both data and queries. For example, across all DBMSs and scales tested, BQSched reduces the overall makespan of batch queries on TPC-DS benchmark by an average of 34% and 13%, compared with the commonly used heuristic strategy and the adapted RL-based scheduler, respectively. The source code of BQSched is available at https://github.com/chxu2000/BQSched.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.670

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207