MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413361377 · doi:10.1109/icde65448.2025.00224

TardySketch: A Framework for Cardinality Estimation Adaptable to Sliding Windows

2025· article· en· W4413361377 on OpenAlexaff
Xuyang Jing, Qinghua Cao, C Zhang, Zheng Yan, Wenxiu Ding, Witold Pedrycz, Pu Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Games
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardinality (data modeling)Computer scienceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sliding cardinality estimation is crucial in many data analysis scenarios, e.g., detecting abnormal network behav-iors by monitoring unique connections in real time, detecting fraud in online transactions by monitoring unique user behavior patterns, and improving inventory management in supply chains by analyzing unique buyer behaviors. However, existing sliding cardinality estimation methods suffer from a cardinality barrel-down problem caused by unexpired item elimination in advance and item excessive removal, which remains unresolved so far. In this paper, we propose TardySketch, a sketch framework to make sliding cardinality estimation accurate and efficient by solving the above problem. The cornerstone of TardySketch is a Bidirectional Pointer-based Bitmap (BP-Bitmap), which stores the arrival sequence of items without timestamps. To prevent the premature elimination of unexpired items, we propose a Gap mechanism to enhance the accuracy of BP-Bitmap for identifying truly expired items through intermittent monitoring. To ensure an appropriate number of items are eliminated as the window moves, we design a Slow-Down mechanism to slacken the reset rate of bucket in BP- Bitmap to prevent over removal of items. Experimental results based on real-world datasets demonstrate that TardySketch significantly outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving a performance improvement of 5–40 times. The source code of TardySketch is available on GitHub.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArtificial Intelligence in GamesFrench-language works237,207