MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413366352 · doi:10.1186/s42269-025-01348-w

Unusual lateral cord of the brachial plexus leading to variation of musculocutaneous and median nerves along with high division of the brachial artery and supernumerary bicipital head

2025· article· en· W4413366352 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel B. Smith, Xiuming Shi, Rowan Urquhart, Ashlyn Pippy, William Paganini Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNerve Injury and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie UniversitySaint John Regional Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMusculocutaneous nerveBrachial plexusMedicineBrachial arteryAnatomySupernumeraryMedian nerveAxillary arteryInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The brachial plexus is a critical network of nerves that supplies sensory and motor innervation to the upper arm and shoulder extremity. Variations in its structure and function have significant implications for clinical practice. Case presentation This case report details the anatomical dissections of a 95-year-old female donor and an 87-year-old male donor, uncovering distinct variations in the brachial plexus, musculocutaneous nerve, median nerve, biceps brachii, and brachial artery. In both cases, the musculocutaneous nerve was replaced by two smaller nerves originating from an unusually long lateral cord. In contrast, the median nerve was formed from a direct continuation of the lateral cord at the middle third of the arm. Additionally, the brachial artery was bifurcated in the middle third of the arm, creating an atypical vascular arrangement in one case, while the second case displayed a supernumerary bicipital head combined with the atypical morphology of the nerves. Conclusions These combined variations are rarely documented, and dissemination of such morphological diversity is important for medical education purposes. Awareness of complex variations as presented in those cases is critical to understanding diagnostics, vascular access, nerve-related conditions, and planning surgical procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research CenterSame topicNerve Injury and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207