MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413368724 · doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1650012

Real-time and resource-efficient banana bunch detection and localization with YOLO-BRFB on edge devices

2025· article· en· W4413368724 on OpenAlexaff
Shuo Wang, Lijiao Wei, Ling Chen, Weihua Huang, Dongjie Du, Zhenhui Zheng, Jieli Duan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSmart Agriculture and AI
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionResource (disambiguation)Computer scienceComputer visionBiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable detection and spatial localization of banana bunches are essential prerequisites for the development of autonomous harvesting technologies. Current methods face challenges in achieving high detection accuracy and efficient deployment due to their structural complexity and significant computational demands. This study proposes YOLO-BRFB, a lightweight and precise system designed for detection and 3D localization of bananas in orchard environments. First, the YOLOv8 framework is improved by integrating the BasicRFB module, enhancing feature extraction for small targets and cluttered backgrounds while reducing model complexity. Then, a binocular vision system is used for localization, estimating 3D spatial coordinates with high accuracy and ensuring robust performance under diverse lighting and occlusion conditions. Finally, the system is optimized for edge-device deployment, achieving real-time processing with minimal computational resources. Experimental results demonstrate that YOLO-BRFB achieves a precision of 0.957, recall of 0.922, mAP of 0.961, and F1-score of 0.939, surpassing YOLOv8 in both recall and mAP. The average positioning error of the system along the X-axis is 12.33 mm, the average positioning error along the Y-axis is 11.11 mm, and the average positioning error along the Z-axis is 16.33 mm. The system has an inference time of 8.6 milliseconds on an Nvidia Orin NX with a GPU memory requirement of 1.7 GB. This study is among the first to focus on a lightweight approach optimized for deployment on edge computing devices. These results highlight the practical applicability of YOLO-BRFB in real-world agricultural scenarios, providing a cost-effective solution for precision harvesting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Plant ScienceSame topicSmart Agriculture and AIFrench-language works237,207