Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reason for the adoption of the International SOLAS Convention, which for the first time established the basic principles of equipping ships with life-saving equipment, was the Titanic disaster in the North Atlantic. Since then, this convention has continued to be improved from accident to accident, and the International Code of Spa Products (LSA Code) has been developed. The lessons of the death of the ocean container ship MOL Comfort on June 17, 2013 in the Indian Ocean became the catalyst for a number of important changes in safety regulations. The crew had to survive in stale air conditions inside a closed lifeboat in stormy weather in tropical waters. But the solution to the problem of ventilation of the boats was delayed for a whole decade. Scientific studies of the microclimate of enclosed rescue vehicles and methods for solving the problem of ventilation in them are considered. The issues of human survival at sea are investigated, experiments conducted in Germany, China, and Canada are described, a mathematical model of air exchange that ensures vital processes in the body is presented, and the requirements for ventilation of fully enclosed life-boats of the International Code of Life-saving Equipment, which will enter into force on January 01, 2026. In order to select the optimal design of the ventilation system for enclosed life-boats, a comparative analysis of projects proposed by leading manufacturers of rescue equipment was carried out. To ensure the quality of ventilation, it is proposed to apply an increasing coefficient of 1.1 when using the above mathematical model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".