MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4413375745 · doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000003214

Urinary heavy metal burden and overactive bladder risk: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES 2005–2018

2025· article· en· W4413375745 on OpenAlexaff
Jinbao Wang, Qiyou Wu, Bo Chen, Jinze Li, Jinjiang Jiang, Xinyang Liao, Qiang Wei

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyQuartileConfidence intervalOveractive bladderOdds ratioLogistic regressionInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the relationship between urinary heavy metals and overactive bladder (OAB) among US adults. METHOD: Data were obtained from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2018. Concentrations of heavy metals in urine were determined by laboratory tests and corrected for urinary creatinine using natural logarithm (ln) transformation. OAB was assessed using questionnaires. The association between each urinary heavy metal and OAB was first explored using multivariate logistic regression, followed by nonlinear correlation analyses and smoothed curve fitting, with stratified analyses and interaction tests for age and sex. In addition, weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression and quantile-based g-computation (qgcomp) analyses were implemented to explore the relationship between mixed heavy metal and OAB. RESULTS: A total of 9086 participants were included in the final study. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis showed that cobalt (Co), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and uranium (Ur) were positively associated with the risk of developing OAB, whereas barium (Ba) and thallium (Tl) were negatively associated with OAB. Nonlinear correlation analysis showed that the associations between the concentrations of Ba and Tl and OAB risk were nonlinear, and Pb, antimony (Sb), tungsten (Tu), Ur, and Cd showed significant positive correlations with OAB. WQS regression showed that OAB risk increased with increasing quartiles of the WQS index [odds ratio (OR) 1.202, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.064-1.357], with Cd showing the strongest positive correlation with OAB. When the mixture effect was constrained to be negative, an increase in the WQS index quartile corresponded to a 14.3% reduction in OAB risk (OR 0.857, 95% CI 0.778-0.943), with Ba standing out as the most dominant. The results of qgcomp analysis showed that Cd had the largest positive weight of 0.5098, and Ba had the largest negative weight of 0.5976. CONCLUSION: Urinary heavy metals are significantly associated with OAB risk among US adults. The metal contributing most to the positive correlation with OAB risk is Cd, while the metal contributing most to the negative correlation with OAB risk is Ba.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of SurgerySame topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207